Full Text
Translation output
$4L,42,44&45
% 03.10.20LL
Present: Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant.
+ CEAC 3L/20LL & CM 1-8s26-LBs2B/201.L
+ CEAC 32120LL & CM 18s33-L8s3s/20l1-
+ CEAC 34/201L & CM 18584-18586/20LL
+ CEAC 35/20L1- & CM L8s9o-18s92/20l1-
* The Tribunal has passed the impugned Order which is common for 1B appeals which have been decided. In respect of one of the Respondent the Revenue had filed CEAC No.25l2011 which was dismissed by this Curt vide ord,ers dated 5'h
September, 20LL holding that the case of the Respondent is covered by Notification No.01/2011-CE(N.T.) dated 1.7th February, 2O!L. Following that order these Appeals are also dismissed.
L,*, SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. ocroBER 03, 201.L rnle
N
SIKRI, J.
2011:DHC:19897-DB
% 03.10.20LL
Present: Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant.
+ CEAC 3L/20LL & CM 1-8s26-LBs2B/201.L
+ CEAC 32120LL & CM 18s33-L8s3s/20l1-
+ CEAC 34/201L & CM 18584-18586/20LL
+ CEAC 35/20L1- & CM L8s9o-18s92/20l1-
* The Tribunal has passed the impugned Order which is common for 1B appeals which have been decided. In respect of one of the Respondent the Revenue had filed CEAC No.25l2011 which was dismissed by this Curt vide ord,ers dated 5'h
September, 20LL holding that the case of the Respondent is covered by Notification No.01/2011-CE(N.T.) dated 1.7th February, 2O!L. Following that order these Appeals are also dismissed.
L,*, SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. ocroBER 03, 201.L rnle
N
SIKRI, J.
2011:DHC:19897-DB
JUDGMENT