Full Text
Translation output
$-21&24 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LPA 278/2011
INDIAN INSTT OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Arjun Mitra Advocate
LPA 278/2011
INDIAN INSTT OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Arjun Mitra Advocate
VERSUS
SUSHIL KOHLI ..... Respondent
Through: None.
Through: None.
LPA 282/2011
/o INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DELHI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Arjun Mitra Advocate
/o INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DELHI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Arjun Mitra Advocate
VERSUS
NAVIN TALWAR ..... Respondent
Through: None.
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON.BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON.BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
03.10.2011
HON.BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
03.10.2011
ORDER
1. Attention of the learned counsel for the appellant has been drawn to the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Central Board of Secondary Education vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors. reported as 2011(8) SCALE 645. In view of the said decision respondent-information seekers are entitled to see the answer sheet written by the LPA No.278/2011 & 282/2011 2011:DHC:16909-DB -~ respondent.
2. Accordingly, the appellant will allow and permit the information seekers to see the answer sheet or the answer form which was filled up by the respondent at the time of examination.
3. The appeals are accordingly disposed of.
4. Dasti.
OCTOBER 03, 2011 pkb LPA No.278/2011 & 282/2011 -7-.;r L-. SANJIV KHANNA, J