Full Text
Translation output
4 20 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV. 206/2011
RAVIDUTTA Petitioner Tlirough: Mr. L.K. Singh, Advocate
RC.REV. 206/2011
RAVIDUTTA Petitioner Tlirough: Mr. L.K. Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
SAVITRI DEVI GOEL DECD THR LRS Respondents Tln'ough: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate with respondent no. 2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
03.10.2011
03.10.2011
CM APPL. 18609/2011
This is an application filed by the petitioner-tenant for v^ithdrawal of the revision petition, which is already fixed for hearing on 30"^ November, 2011, on the ground that since he cannot pay the charges for use and occupation as directed by this Court vide order dated 16'*' August, 2011 he surrendered the possession of the tenanted premises to the respondents-landlords.
Counsel for the respondents-landlords on instructions from the respondent no. 2, who is present in person also, accepts this position.
This application is accordingly allowed and consequently, the revision petition itself is taken up today and the same is dismissed as withdrawn. The date of 30"^ November, 2011 stands cancelled. It would be open to the respondents to take appropriate steps against the petitioner-tenant for recovery of arrears of rent, electricity charges etc. which they are claiming to be payaj^le by the petitioner, in accordance with law.
¥ P.K. BHASM, J OCTOBER 03, 2011 2011:DHC:16216
This is an application filed by the petitioner-tenant for v^ithdrawal of the revision petition, which is already fixed for hearing on 30"^ November, 2011, on the ground that since he cannot pay the charges for use and occupation as directed by this Court vide order dated 16'*' August, 2011 he surrendered the possession of the tenanted premises to the respondents-landlords.
Counsel for the respondents-landlords on instructions from the respondent no. 2, who is present in person also, accepts this position.
This application is accordingly allowed and consequently, the revision petition itself is taken up today and the same is dismissed as withdrawn. The date of 30"^ November, 2011 stands cancelled. It would be open to the respondents to take appropriate steps against the petitioner-tenant for recovery of arrears of rent, electricity charges etc. which they are claiming to be payaj^le by the petitioner, in accordance with law.
¥ P.K. BHASM, J OCTOBER 03, 2011 2011:DHC:16216
JUDGMENT