Mahalaxmi Textile Industries v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:19385
Manmohan Singh
ARB.P. T74/2011
2011:DHC:19385
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted the respondent four weeks to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement, declining immediate court appointment under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Full Text
Translation output
s-2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI ARB.P. T74/2OTT i\{/S MAHALAXMI TEXTILE INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. B.S. Mathur, Adv. VETSUS LINION OF INDIA
Through ..... Respondent Mt. {uy Verma, Adv.
CORAM:
I{ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
10.10.2011 The petitioner I\Os Mahalaxmi Textile Industries has filed the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying that the arbitrator be appointed in accordance with the governing arbitration clause to adjudicate the dispute between the parties. A further prayer is also made that this Court may also appoint an independent arbitrator in accordance with law. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of tlie respondent submits that the respondent is taking necessary steps to a appoint the arbitrator in terms of Clause-24 of the Agreement. The learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted the suggestion of the learned counsel for the respondent. His submission is that some fixed time be given by this t)
2011:DHC:19385 /'1 '\' -^:-+ +L^ ^-Li+-ornr in forr-nc nf Clarrse )4 ofthe Asrgemgnt. /
Court to appoint the arbitrator in terms of Clause 24 of the Agreement'
Under these circumstances, the present petition is disposed of' The respondent is granted four weeks' time to appoint the arbitrator as per the
Agreement.
MAtiilffi"\ffr,ffiil111 ocroBER 1.0, 20lllka r)
2011:DHC:19385
JUDGMENT