Full Text
Translation output
q-, $-24 HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) 810/2011
RUBY ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.R.D. Chauhan with Mr.Arun K.Chauhan, Advs.
Petitioner in person.
VETSUS
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Harsh Prabhakar proxy counsel for
Standing Counsel Mr.Pawan Sharma for State with SI Manoj Kumar from PS
Rohini (North).
Respondent No.3 in person.
RUBY ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.R.D. Chauhan with Mr.Arun K.Chauhan, Advs.
Petitioner in person.
VETSUS
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Harsh Prabhakar proxy counsel for
Standing Counsel Mr.Pawan Sharma for State with SI Manoj Kumar from PS
Rohini (North).
Respondent No.3 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER oh 10.10.2011 Respondent No.3 is present in person. He states that they have reconciled the matter in view of the fact that the Petitioner is married of her own free will to Raj Kumar and they undertake not to interfere in the happy married life of the Petitioner with Raj Kumar.
In view of this statement of Respondent No.3, the Petitioner, who is present in Court, does not press the present petition.
The petition is dismissed as not pressed.
W4,rb- / MUKTA GUPTA.J ocToBER t0,20tl 'mb' 2011:DHC:18092
ORDER oh 10.10.2011 Respondent No.3 is present in person. He states that they have reconciled the matter in view of the fact that the Petitioner is married of her own free will to Raj Kumar and they undertake not to interfere in the happy married life of the Petitioner with Raj Kumar.
In view of this statement of Respondent No.3, the Petitioner, who is present in Court, does not press the present petition.
The petition is dismissed as not pressed.
W4,rb- / MUKTA GUPTA.J ocToBER t0,20tl 'mb' 2011:DHC:18092
JUDGMENT