Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:16354-DB
Vaj; Siddharth Mridul
WP(C) NO. 589:3/2011
2011:DHC:16354-DB
constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions as barred by a prior Full Bench decision, refusing amendments challenging retrospectivity.

Full Text
Translation output
0^
% 10.10.2011
#60 to #86 & #98
Present: Mr.|l.R. Satish, Advocate for the Petitioner (in WP(C) NO. 589:3/2011). i^r. K. Ravi and iv|r. Pravesh Tha[<ur, Advocates for the
Petitioner ( in WP(C) Nos. 5905/2011 and 5908/2011). ' l^r. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with i^r. I^ukesh Anand, Mr. Vidit
Gupta, Ms. Namrata Sharma and Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate for the Respondent UOI.
Mr. Neelesh Sinha, 'Advocate for Respondent No. 5 and 11
(in WP(C) No. 6206/2011)
+WPra Nos. 4654/2011. 5888-5904/2011, 5907-5910/2011
6206-6208/2011 and 7354/2011
*
In view of Full Bench decision dated 23'"^ Septemb^, 2011 with lead case titled as Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. vs. Union of
India & Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 3398/2010), all these writ petitions are dismissed.
Learned counsel appearing in writ petition N
5908/2011 submits that he be allowed to amend with prayer to challenge the retrospectivity. Even that aspect is covered by the aforesaid
JUDGMENT
of the Full Bench
Furthermore, since these writ petitions are heard by this Bench
I on the basis of orders passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court transferring the same from other High Courts and jwe are dismissing the writ petitions on the ground that the same are covered by the aforesaid judgment of the FUN Bench, we are not inc ined to grant the
•. 5905/2011 and the writ petitions
2011:DHC:16354-DB prayer for amendment of the writ petitions.
OCTOBER 10, 2011
Vaj"
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
2011:DHC:16354-DB