Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:16346-DB
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
WP(C) NO. 5893/2011
2011:DHC:16346-DB
constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions as barred by a binding Full Bench decision, refusing to allow amendments challenging retrospectivity.

Full Text
Translation output
#60 to #86 & #98
% 10.10.20111
Present: Mr. LR. Satish, Advocate for the Petitioner (in WP(C) NO. 5893/2011).
I^r. K. Ravi and i^r. Pravesh Thal<ur, Advocates for the
Petitioner ( in WP(C) Nos. 5905/2011 and 5908/2011). ivir. A.S. Chandhiol<, ASG with i^r. iv|ul<esh Anand, Mr. Vidit
Gupta, Ms. Nannrata Sharma and Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate for the Respondent UOI.
Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 and 11
(in WP(C) No. 6206/2011)
+WPfC^ Nos. 4654/2011. 5888-5904/2011. 5907-5910/2011
6206-6208/2011 and 7354/2011
* ,!
/ In view of Full Bench decision dated 23'"^ Septennb^, 2011 with lead case titled as Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. vs. Union of
India &Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 3398/2010), all these writ petitions are dismissed.
' . i
Learned counsel appearing in writ petition l\jo. 5905/2011 and
I i
5908/2011 submits that he be allowed to amend! the writ petitions
L with prayer to challenge the retrospectivity. Even that aspect is covered by the aforesaid
JUDGMENT
of the Full Bench.
Furthermore, since these writ petitions are heard by this Bench j on the basis of orders passed by Hon'ble tHe Supreme Court
transferring the same from other High Courts anc we are dismissing the writ petitions on the ground that the same ire covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Full Bench, we are not in zlined to grant the
2011:DHC:16346-DB prayer for amendment of the writ petitions.
OCTOBER 10, 2011
Yaj'
-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL/J.
2011:DHC:16346-DB