Full Text
Translation output
w
#60 to #86 & #98
% 10.10.2011
Present: Mr. I.R. Satish, Advocate for the Petitioner (in WP(C) NO. 5893/2011). ^ _ jvir K Ravi and i^r. Pravesh Thal<ur, Advocates for the
Petitioner ( in WP(C) Nos. 5905/2011 and 5908/2011). ivir. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr. Mukesh Anand, Mr. Vidit
Gupta, Ms. Nannrata Sharma and Mr. Bhagat Singh, , Advocate for the Respondent UOI.
Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 and 11
(in WP(C) No. 6206/2011)
4-WPfn Nos. 4654/2011. 5888-5904/2011. 5907-5910/2011
6206-6208/2011 and 7354/2011
* •
In view of Full Bench decision dated 23'"^ Septemb^, 2011 with lead case titled as Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. vs. Union of
India &Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 3398/2010), all these writ petitions are dismissed.
Learned counsel appearing in writ petition No. 5905/2011 and
5908/2011 submits that he be allowed to amend the writ petitions with prayer to challenge the retrospectivity. Even that aspect is covered by the aforesaid
#60 to #86 & #98
% 10.10.2011
Present: Mr. I.R. Satish, Advocate for the Petitioner (in WP(C) NO. 5893/2011). ^ _ jvir K Ravi and i^r. Pravesh Thal<ur, Advocates for the
Petitioner ( in WP(C) Nos. 5905/2011 and 5908/2011). ivir. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr. Mukesh Anand, Mr. Vidit
Gupta, Ms. Nannrata Sharma and Mr. Bhagat Singh, , Advocate for the Respondent UOI.
Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 and 11
(in WP(C) No. 6206/2011)
4-WPfn Nos. 4654/2011. 5888-5904/2011. 5907-5910/2011
6206-6208/2011 and 7354/2011
* •
In view of Full Bench decision dated 23'"^ Septemb^, 2011 with lead case titled as Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. vs. Union of
India &Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 3398/2010), all these writ petitions are dismissed.
Learned counsel appearing in writ petition No. 5905/2011 and
5908/2011 submits that he be allowed to amend the writ petitions with prayer to challenge the retrospectivity. Even that aspect is covered by the aforesaid
JUDGMENT
of the Full Bench.
\
Furthermore, since these writ petitions are hleard by this Bench on the basis, of orders passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court transferring the same from other High Courts anc we are dismissing the writ petitions on the ground that the same are covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Full Bench, we are not inclined to grant the
2011:DHC:16333-DB prayer for amendment of the writ petitions.
2^
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
OCTOBER 10, 2011
Vaj'
2011:DHC:16333-DB
\
Furthermore, since these writ petitions are hleard by this Bench on the basis, of orders passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court transferring the same from other High Courts anc we are dismissing the writ petitions on the ground that the same are covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Full Bench, we are not inclined to grant the
2011:DHC:16333-DB prayer for amendment of the writ petitions.
2^
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
OCTOBER 10, 2011
Vaj'
2011:DHC:16333-DB