Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:16326-DB
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
WP(C) NO. 5893/2011
2011:DHC:16326-DB
constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions as the issues were conclusively covered by a prior Full Bench decision, refusing amendment to challenge retrospectivity.

Full Text
Translation output
#60 to #86 & #98
% 10.10.2011
Present: Mr. ij.R. Satish, Advocate for the Petitioner (in WP(C) NO. 5893/2011). ^
Mr. iK. Ravi and Mr. Pravesh Thakur, Advocates for the
Petitioner(in WP(C)Nos. 5905/2011 and 5908/2011).
Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr. Mukesh Anand, Mr. Vidit
Gupta, Ms. Nannrata Sharma and Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate fdr the Respondent UOI.
Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 and 11
(in WP(C) No. 6206/2011)
■4-WPfn Nop- 4654/20J1^ 5888-5904/2011, 5907-5910/2011 fi2Q6-6208/2011finri 7354/|2011
In view of Full Bench decision dated 23'"' Septemb^, 2011 with lead case titled as Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. vs. Union of
India & Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 3398/2010), all these writ petitions are dismissed. ^
Learned counsel appearing in writ petition No. 5905/2011 and
5908/2011 submits that he be allowed to amend the writ petitions with prayer to challenge the retrospectivity. Even that aspect is covered by the aforesaid
JUDGMENT
of the Full Bench.
Furtherrhore, since these writ petitions are h:eard by this Bench i on the basis of orders passed by Hon'ble ttje Supreme Court transferring the same fropi other High Courts and we are dismissing the writ petitions on the ground that the same are covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Fuli Bench, we are not inciined to grant the
2011:DHC:16326-DB prayer for amendment of the writ petitions.
OCTOBER 10,2011
Vaj'
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
^
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL,J.
2011:DHC:16326-DB