Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:16319-DB
Vajpai, Acting Chief Justice; Siddharth Mridul, J.
WP(C) NO. 5893/2011
2011:DHC:16319-DB
constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging government actions as barred by a binding Full Bench decision and refused amendment to raise already adjudicated issues.

Full Text
Translation output
♦
#60 to #86 & #98
% 10.10.2011
Present: Mr. I.R. Satish, Advocate for the Petitioner (in WP(C) NO. 5893/2011).
Mr. :K. Ravi and i^r. Pravesh Thal<ur, Advocates for the
Petitioner ( in WP(C) Nos. 5905/2011 and 5908/2011).
Mr. A.S. Chandhiol<, ASG with l^ir. IMukesh Anand, Mr. Vidit
^ ' Gupta, Ms. Namrata Sharnna and Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate for the Respondent UOI.
Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 and 11
(in WP(C) No. 6206/2011)
+WPrO Nos. 4654/2011. 5888-5904/2011, 5907-5910/2011
6206-6208/2011 and 7354/1^011
* • .
In view of Full Bench decision dated 23''' Septennb^, 2011 with lead case titled as Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. vs. Union of
India &Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 3398/2010), all these writ petitions are dismissed.:
JUDGMENT

0. 5905/2011 and the writ petitions Learned counsel appearing in writ petition ^ 5908/2011 submits that he be allowed to amend with prayer to challenge the retrospectivity. Even that aspect is covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Full Bench. ! Furthermore, since these writ petitions are hieard by this Bench on the basis of orders passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court transferring the same from other High Courts anc we are dismissing the writ petitions on the ground that the same are covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Full Bench, we are not in zlined to grant the 2011:DHC:16319-DB prayer for amendment of the writ petitions.

OCTOBER 10, 2011 Vaj' ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.