Full Text
Translation output
*
#60 to #86 & #98
% 10.10.2011
Present: Mrl LR. Satish, Advocate for the Petitioner (in WP(C) NO. 5893/2011).
Mr. K. Ravi and i^r. Pravesh Thakur, Advocates for the
Petitioner ( in WP(C) Nos. 5905/2011 and 5908/2011).
I^r. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with i^r. i^ukesh Anand, l^r. Vidit
Gupta, Ms. Namrata Sharma and Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate for the Respondent UOI.
Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Advocate "for Respondent No. 5 and 11
(in, WP(C) No. 6206/2011)
+WPfC^ Nos. 4654/2011. 5888-5904/2011, 5907-5910/2011
6206-6208/2011 and 7354/2011 f *
^ In view of Full Bench decision dated 23'"'^ September, 2011 with lead case titled as Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. vs. Union of
India & Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 3398/2010), all these writ petitions are dismissed., Learned counsel appearing in writ petition No. 5905/2011 and
I
5908/2011 submits that he be allowed to amend the writ petitions
I with prayer to challenge the retrospectivity. Evien that aspect is
^ covered by the aforesaid
#60 to #86 & #98
% 10.10.2011
Present: Mrl LR. Satish, Advocate for the Petitioner (in WP(C) NO. 5893/2011).
Mr. K. Ravi and i^r. Pravesh Thakur, Advocates for the
Petitioner ( in WP(C) Nos. 5905/2011 and 5908/2011).
I^r. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with i^r. i^ukesh Anand, l^r. Vidit
Gupta, Ms. Namrata Sharma and Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate for the Respondent UOI.
Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Advocate "for Respondent No. 5 and 11
(in, WP(C) No. 6206/2011)
+WPfC^ Nos. 4654/2011. 5888-5904/2011, 5907-5910/2011
6206-6208/2011 and 7354/2011 f *
^ In view of Full Bench decision dated 23'"'^ September, 2011 with lead case titled as Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. vs. Union of
India & Ors. (Writ Petition (C) No. 3398/2010), all these writ petitions are dismissed., Learned counsel appearing in writ petition No. 5905/2011 and
I
5908/2011 submits that he be allowed to amend the writ petitions
I with prayer to challenge the retrospectivity. Evien that aspect is
^ covered by the aforesaid
JUDGMENT
of the Full Bench.
Furthermore, since these writ petitions are heard by this Bench on the basis of orders passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court transferring the same from other High Courts andjwe are dismissing the writ petitions on the ground that the same a|re covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Full Bench, we are not incjlined to grant the
2011:DHC:16232-DB prayer for amendpnent of the writ petitions.
Z-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
OCTOBER 10, 2011
Yaj'
2011:DHC:16232-DB
Furthermore, since these writ petitions are heard by this Bench on the basis of orders passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court transferring the same from other High Courts andjwe are dismissing the writ petitions on the ground that the same a|re covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Full Bench, we are not incjlined to grant the
2011:DHC:16232-DB prayer for amendpnent of the writ petitions.
Z-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
OCTOBER 10, 2011
Yaj'
2011:DHC:16232-DB