7c0d8a32340694cb5be6357423d756464e3433bf530c05025be9a613f473e302

Delhi High Court · 14 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:15797-DB
Anil Kumar; Sudershan Kumar Misra
2011:DHC:15797-DB
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition in default due to the petitioner's non-appearance and vacated the interim orders granted therein.

Full Text
Translation output
i.s 19 o/oL4.10.2011
Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Kumar, Advocate forMr. Sachin Dutta, Advocate for the respondent/UOI.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter having been passed over once. No one had been present even on 24th August, 2}tt and 21't September, 2OLL.
,/ The writ petition is dismissed in default.
The interim order dated l8th August, 2OtO, varied by the order dated 13th July, 2OIL, is vacated.
},-/'"Ll---t
ANIL KUMAR, J. t\
'l L^. -uL
,qt SUDERSHAN KOMAR MISRA/ J.
October t4,20Lt dr
2011:DHC:15797-DB
JUDGMENT