Full Text
Translation output
r.t 41# $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI -r- w.P.(cru.) 1389/2011
DALJIT SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg, Advocate with Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STA]B rhrough: Mr. Manoj ohri, APP [:Vli:lln."
Sharma, Standing Counscl with SI Jai Prakash. PS Shahdara.
DALJIT SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg, Advocate with Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STA]B rhrough: Mr. Manoj ohri, APP [:Vli:lln."
Sharma, Standing Counscl with SI Jai Prakash. PS Shahdara.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
12.10.201,1 l'his is a pctition for quashing of IrIIt No. 17812009 under Sections
498A1406134 IPC and Section 314 of the Dowr. Prohibition Act. 196I rcgistered at PS Shahdara, Delhi.
'l.Le Cornplainant/Petitioner No. 7 Ms. Aanchu Kaur is prescnt in person. She states that the Petitioners and she have entered into a
Cornpromisc. In tcrms of the scttlement, marriage between the Petitioner NO. 1 artd Pctitioner No. T lComplainant has been dissolved by u decrcc of divorcc by rnutual consent on 7th liebruary, 20II. As full and final settlernent of all the clairns of the Petitioner No. 7, the Petitioner No. t has to pay t4.50 lakhs out of which {3 lakhs have already been paid to her and T1.50 lakhs w.P.(cRL) 138e/2011 Page I of 2
2011:DHC:18264 havc bccn paid today vide Demand Draft No. 359750 dated 20th August, Z0Il drawn on Puniab and Sind Bank, Tilak Nagar. She further states that in vicw of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovcmcntioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parlies have arnicably resolvcd their diffcrences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the samc would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thcreto.
Consecluently, FIR No. 178/2009 under Sections 498N406134 IPC and Scction 314 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 196l registered at PS
Shahdara, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. r Parties, who are duly identified by their counsel, have signed this order shcct in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Cour1.
W!/,^fL_ MUKTA GUPTA, J. fo"d", /<ea:c ' -"- w.P.(cRL) 1389/2011 Page 2 oJ 2 q au=!1,2 Rt<-1v..; DEU -tsqzgo _("^ R4 l, SL"+h
It ,.i;' F L,-.rLLf {"rv_"/ p__,}*** Aqrcz"rtre*t
\IJA..^2A.UI |''\.' (pt ,- o h, Y*. - v fl-_ \^,E.rf[nq s{?YXW, dcrt-llffiq v'J[Jr
2011:DHC:18264
12.10.201,1 l'his is a pctition for quashing of IrIIt No. 17812009 under Sections
498A1406134 IPC and Section 314 of the Dowr. Prohibition Act. 196I rcgistered at PS Shahdara, Delhi.
'l.Le Cornplainant/Petitioner No. 7 Ms. Aanchu Kaur is prescnt in person. She states that the Petitioners and she have entered into a
Cornpromisc. In tcrms of the scttlement, marriage between the Petitioner NO. 1 artd Pctitioner No. T lComplainant has been dissolved by u decrcc of divorcc by rnutual consent on 7th liebruary, 20II. As full and final settlernent of all the clairns of the Petitioner No. 7, the Petitioner No. t has to pay t4.50 lakhs out of which {3 lakhs have already been paid to her and T1.50 lakhs w.P.(cRL) 138e/2011 Page I of 2
2011:DHC:18264 havc bccn paid today vide Demand Draft No. 359750 dated 20th August, Z0Il drawn on Puniab and Sind Bank, Tilak Nagar. She further states that in vicw of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovcmcntioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parlies have arnicably resolvcd their diffcrences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the samc would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thcreto.
Consecluently, FIR No. 178/2009 under Sections 498N406134 IPC and Scction 314 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 196l registered at PS
Shahdara, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. r Parties, who are duly identified by their counsel, have signed this order shcct in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Cour1.
W!/,^fL_ MUKTA GUPTA, J. fo"d", /<ea:c ' -"- w.P.(cRL) 1389/2011 Page 2 oJ 2 q au=!1,2 Rt<-1v..; DEU -tsqzgo _("^ R4 l, SL"+h
It ,.i;' F L,-.rLLf {"rv_"/ p__,}*** Aqrcz"rtre*t
\IJA..^2A.UI |''\.' (pt ,- o h, Y*. - v fl-_ \^,E.rf[nq s{?YXW, dcrt-llffiq v'J[Jr
2011:DHC:18264
JUDGMENT