Full Text
,< IN THE HIGH COURT OF
+ w.P.(cRL) L37O/20LL
WAHID AHMAD
DELHI AT NEW DELHI... .. Petitioner
STATE
ORDER. L2.10.201 1
I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent who has put in appearance in response to an advance copy having been
Through: Mr.Vishal Sehijpal and Mr'
Farooq Chaudhary, Advocates.
VCTSUS..... Respondent
Through: Mr.DaYan Krishnan, ASC.1 o/o
1.
1= served.
JUDGMENT
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has already applied to the State Government for grant of parole in order to enable him to file Special Leave Petition against the judgment dated 11.08.20LI, upholding the conviction of the appellant for an offence u/s 302/34 IPC in respect of FIR No.615/2005 registered with P.S. Seelampur. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that although the application for grant of parole was made to the State Government almost four months back but no decision has 2011:DHC:18259
3.
4.
5. been taken by the respondent till date. Having regard to the facts of the case, the State Government is directed to dispose of the application of the petitioner for grant of parole within a period of four weeks from today. A copy of this order be sent to the Chief Secretary, Government of Delhi and a copy thereof be made available to the counsel for the parties. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. v.K. sHALr, J a ocToBER 12, 2O1L mr ae../