Full Text
Translation output
$-2s HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(CRL) 98912011 & Crl.M.A. No.790Il20I1 (stay)
KUNAL RAJ & ANR.
Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Jitender Mehta, Adv. along with
Petitioners in person. ..... Respondents APP for the State
Singh, P.S. Tilak
KUNAL RAJ & ANR.
Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Jitender Mehta, Adv. along with
Petitioners in person. ..... Respondents APP for the State
Singh, P.S. Tilak
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, with SI Sahdev M*g, New Delhi.
R-3 in person.
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, with SI Sahdev M*g, New Delhi.
R-3 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER oh 12.10.2011 Respondent No.3 is present in Court. He states that he has come to know about to the marriage of his daughter, who is Petitioner No.2 in the present petition, through the notice of this petition. He further states that he has not lodged any FIR against the Petitioners and also does not wish to lodge the same since the Petitioners are major. Neither he nor any of his family members will interfere in the happy married life of the Petitioner and he also expects that the petitioners will also not interfere in their lives.
In view of the statement of Respondent No.3, learned counsel for the
Petitioners on instructions from the Petitioners, who are present in Court, 2011:DHC:18102 t"{ states that he does not wish to press the present petition.
The petition and the application are dismissed as not pressed. ltr'.V|/nL-
/MUKTA GUPTA,J ocroBER t2,20tl tvkmt 2011:DHC:18102
ORDER oh 12.10.2011 Respondent No.3 is present in Court. He states that he has come to know about to the marriage of his daughter, who is Petitioner No.2 in the present petition, through the notice of this petition. He further states that he has not lodged any FIR against the Petitioners and also does not wish to lodge the same since the Petitioners are major. Neither he nor any of his family members will interfere in the happy married life of the Petitioner and he also expects that the petitioners will also not interfere in their lives.
In view of the statement of Respondent No.3, learned counsel for the
Petitioners on instructions from the Petitioners, who are present in Court, 2011:DHC:18102 t"{ states that he does not wish to press the present petition.
The petition and the application are dismissed as not pressed. ltr'.V|/nL-
/MUKTA GUPTA,J ocroBER t2,20tl tvkmt 2011:DHC:18102
JUDGMENT