Full Text
Translation output
e
' l-?a
$-46
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DI,LHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 4289t2011
SUNIL I(UMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person with Mr.Narender
Kumar Verma. Advocate
' l-?a
$-46
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DI,LHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 4289t2011
SUNIL I(UMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person with Mr.Narender
Kumar Verma. Advocate
VERSUS
STATE & ANR ..... Rcspondent
Thlough: Ms. Fizani I{usain, APP rvith IO in person.
Respondent No. 2 Madhu Bala in person.
Thlough: Ms. Fizani I{usain, APP rvith IO in person.
Respondent No. 2 Madhu Bala in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLB MR. JUSTICB M.L. MEHTA
ORDDR
% 2t.r2.201r
+Crl.M.A.No. 19699/2011 (Exemrrtion)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Crl.M.C. 428912011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 56912003, under Sections
498A1406 IPC, registered at P.S. R.K.Puram on the ground that the parties have inter se conpromised the matter. FIR was registered on the complaint of a?:
2011:DHC:10904
5\
(tl the respondent No. 2 Madhu Bala.
Both the parties are present in pelson and are identified by their counsel and the Investigating Officer. The respondent No. 2, who is the complainant and the petitioner state that they have compromised the matter and now there is no dispute left. It is stated that the settlement amount of Rs.
65,000/- has already been paid to the complainant/respondent No. 2, receipt of which she adrnits. Respondent No. 2 states that she has compromised the rnatter with the petitioner out of her own fi'ee will and volition and without any pressure or coercion of any sort and no'uv, she is left with no grievance against the petitioner and she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.
In view of the foregoing and the fact that the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIRNo. 56gl2003,under Sections 498V1406IPC, legistered at P.S. R.K.Puram and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are helby quashed. Bail bond of the petitioner is cancelled and his surety is discharged.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly. t
Order dasti under the signatures of Court Master. ,/)
-b\t04-
M.L. MEHTA,J
DECEMBER 21, 2011 e*b-
2011:DHC:10904
ORDDR
% 2t.r2.201r
+Crl.M.A.No. 19699/2011 (Exemrrtion)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Crl.M.C. 428912011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 56912003, under Sections
498A1406 IPC, registered at P.S. R.K.Puram on the ground that the parties have inter se conpromised the matter. FIR was registered on the complaint of a?:
2011:DHC:10904
5\
(tl the respondent No. 2 Madhu Bala.
Both the parties are present in pelson and are identified by their counsel and the Investigating Officer. The respondent No. 2, who is the complainant and the petitioner state that they have compromised the matter and now there is no dispute left. It is stated that the settlement amount of Rs.
65,000/- has already been paid to the complainant/respondent No. 2, receipt of which she adrnits. Respondent No. 2 states that she has compromised the rnatter with the petitioner out of her own fi'ee will and volition and without any pressure or coercion of any sort and no'uv, she is left with no grievance against the petitioner and she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.
In view of the foregoing and the fact that the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIRNo. 56gl2003,under Sections 498V1406IPC, legistered at P.S. R.K.Puram and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are helby quashed. Bail bond of the petitioner is cancelled and his surety is discharged.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly. t
Order dasti under the signatures of Court Master. ,/)
-b\t04-
M.L. MEHTA,J
DECEMBER 21, 2011 e*b-
2011:DHC:10904
JUDGMENT