Full Text
Translation output
t)
$-8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF
MAC.APP. 430/2008
MAN MOHAN MEHTA
Through:
$-8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF
MAC.APP. 430/2008
MAN MOHAN MEHTA
Through:
VERSUS
ASHOK KUMAR BHAGAT
DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Appellant ivlr. D.R. Bhatia, Adv. ..... Respondent
DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Appellant ivlr. D.R. Bhatia, Adv. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL
% 12.0t.20r2
It is submitted by Mr. D.R. Bhatia, learned counsel for the Appellant that despite his best efforts, the Appellant is not contacting him. He has written registered letter also to the Appellant but there is no response.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Appellant that he is unable to address arguments for want of further instructions.
In this view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Pending applications also stand disposed of.
JANUARY I2,2OI2
Dt
2012:DHC:10367
% 12.0t.20r2
It is submitted by Mr. D.R. Bhatia, learned counsel for the Appellant that despite his best efforts, the Appellant is not contacting him. He has written registered letter also to the Appellant but there is no response.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Appellant that he is unable to address arguments for want of further instructions.
In this view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Pending applications also stand disposed of.
JANUARY I2,2OI2
Dt
2012:DHC:10367
JUDGMENT