Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 26th November, 2024
SHYAM SUNDER AGGARWAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Puneet Goyal, Advocate.
Through: Ms. Tatini Basu, SC for R-1.
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings for non-compliance of the directions contained in order dated 22.08.2024 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 11560/2024.
2. This Court has gone through the above said order whereby it was directed as under:-
CONT.CAS(C) 1872/2024 2
3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 i.e. Central Vigilance Commission appears on advance notice and informs that the matter was referred to MCD for examining the allegations made by the complainant and they have received one Action Taken Report dated 21.10.2024 from MCD which clearly indicates that the building in question has already been sealed and is presently uninhabited and the further action of demolition is to be initiated in terms of the above said decision.
4. It is also informed that the above said facts were duly communicated to petitioner herein vide a letter dated 18.11.2024 sent by the Director, Central Vigilance Commission. A complete set thereof has been shown to the Court and a spare set has also been submitted to learned counsel for petitioner.
5. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that no further action is required with respect to the present contempt petition.
6. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
7. However, if petitioner feels himself aggrieved by the aforesaid decision, he is always at liberty to take appropriate action as permissible under law.
JUDGE NOVEMBER 26, 2024