Full Text
Translation output
$-
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF w.P.(c) 267 s/20r2
SAHUKAR SINGH AND ORS
Throueh:
DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioners
Mr. Vinay Sabharwal & Ms. Neha
Sabhanval, Advocates
&r
SAHUKAR SINGH AND ORS
Throueh:
DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioners
Mr. Vinay Sabharwal & Ms. Neha
Sabhanval, Advocates
&r
VERSUS
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Keshav Mohan, Advocate
Through: Mr. Keshav Mohan, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
07.05.2012
Notice. Mr. Keshav Mohan accepts notice of this writ petition on behalf of the respondent.
The main grievance of the petitioners is that despite the fact that the respondent was directed by this Court vide its order dated 5th February, 2009 in W.P.(C) No. 728612008 to complete the pending enquiry under
Section 7-A of the Drnployees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act the same has not been done till today.
The fact that the enquiry is still pending is not being disputed by the counsel for the respondent. However, he says that in the earlier writ petition no time frarne was fixed within which the enquiry was to be cornpleted and he has no objection if the Court now fixes a time lirnit for the conclusion of the enquiry. Counsel for the petitioners says that if such a direction is given to the respondent he would withdraw this writ petition. o/o
C w.P.(ct 267512012 Pase 1 of2
2012:DHC:10482 r . ri . i.
While disrnissing this writ petition as withdrarvn the respondent is directed to conclude the pending enquiry under Section 7-A of the
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act within three months frorn today.
P.K. BHASIN
NIAY 07,.2012/pg w.P.(c\ 267st2012 Pase2 of2
O
2012:DHC:10482
07.05.2012
Notice. Mr. Keshav Mohan accepts notice of this writ petition on behalf of the respondent.
The main grievance of the petitioners is that despite the fact that the respondent was directed by this Court vide its order dated 5th February, 2009 in W.P.(C) No. 728612008 to complete the pending enquiry under
Section 7-A of the Drnployees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act the same has not been done till today.
The fact that the enquiry is still pending is not being disputed by the counsel for the respondent. However, he says that in the earlier writ petition no time frarne was fixed within which the enquiry was to be cornpleted and he has no objection if the Court now fixes a time lirnit for the conclusion of the enquiry. Counsel for the petitioners says that if such a direction is given to the respondent he would withdraw this writ petition. o/o
C w.P.(ct 267512012 Pase 1 of2
2012:DHC:10482 r . ri . i.
While disrnissing this writ petition as withdrarvn the respondent is directed to conclude the pending enquiry under Section 7-A of the
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act within three months frorn today.
P.K. BHASIN
NIAY 07,.2012/pg w.P.(c\ 267st2012 Pase2 of2
O
2012:DHC:10482
JUDGMENT