Full Text
Translation output
$-49 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 618/2012
DEEPAK Petitioner
Through; Mr.Sunil Mittal, Mr.Kshitij Mittal, Advs.
BAIL APPLN. 618/2012
DEEPAK Petitioner
Through; Mr.Sunil Mittal, Mr.Kshitij Mittal, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Ms.Fizani Husain,APP with SI Rishikesh, P.S.Shakarpur.
Through: Ms.Fizani Husain,APP with SI Rishikesh, P.S.Shakarpur.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA
07.05.2012 Crl.M.A.No. 5610/2012 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Bail Appln. 618/2012 This is a petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 148/2012, under
Sections 308/323/325/34 IPG, P.S. Shakarpur.
Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. Having regard to the entire factual matrix, the petitioner in the event of arrest, shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with
2012:DHC:9703 one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting
Officer/Investigating Officer/SHO and subject to the conditionthat petitionershall join the investigation as and when calledby the Investigating Officer.
Petition stands disposed of
Order dasti.
M.L. MEHTA,J MAY 07, 2012 2012:DHC:9703
07.05.2012 Crl.M.A.No. 5610/2012 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Bail Appln. 618/2012 This is a petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 148/2012, under
Sections 308/323/325/34 IPG, P.S. Shakarpur.
Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. Having regard to the entire factual matrix, the petitioner in the event of arrest, shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with
2012:DHC:9703 one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting
Officer/Investigating Officer/SHO and subject to the conditionthat petitionershall join the investigation as and when calledby the Investigating Officer.
Petition stands disposed of
Order dasti.
M.L. MEHTA,J MAY 07, 2012 2012:DHC:9703
JUDGMENT