Naresh Kumar Taneja @ Pappu v. State

Delhi High Court · 09 May 2012 · 2012:DHC:9713
M. L. Mehta
Bail Appln. 640/2012
2012:DHC:9713
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a theft and house trespass case after charge sheet filing, subject to bond and conditions preventing witness tampering.

Full Text
Translation output
vi $-39 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 640/2012
NARESH KUMAR TANEJA @ PAPPU Petitioner
Through: Mr.Puneet K., Adv.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. \
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA
09.05.2012 Crl.M.A.No.5732/2012 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Bail Appln. 640/2012 This is a regular bail application under Section 439 CrPC in case FIR NO. 12/2012, under Sections 451/380/34 IPG, P.S. Maurya Enclave.
Having regard to the entire factual matrix and the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 10.1.2012, the co-accused is on bail and the charge sheet has also been filed, the petitioner is admitted on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, and also subject to the condition that he shall not try to influence or win-over the witnesses.
Dasti.
MAY 09, 2012 M.L. MEHTA, J 2012:DHC:9713
JUDGMENT