Payal Malik v. Nagesh Malik

1. Shri Basava Prabhul Patil, learned senior counsel appearing for the contemnor/respondent would submit that pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, the respondent herein has deposited a sum of Rs.[2] lacs before the learned Magistrate (Mahila Court), South East District, New Delhi. Further, today he is offering a demand draft for a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the learned counsel appearing for the complainant. Both sides would agree that the aforesaid amounts would satisfy the interim directions issued by this Court upto the end of July, 2012.

2. The complainant, if she so desires, is at liberty to withdraw the sum of Rs.[2] lacs deposited by the contemnor before the learned Magistrate. The learned counsel appearing for the complainant acknowledges the draft handed over by Shri Patil, Page 2: 2: learned senior counsel, for and on behalf of the contemnor. In view of this, nothing survives in this Contempt Petition and the same is accordingly, disposed of. Ordered accordingly ........................ J. (H.L. DATTU) ....................... J. (CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD) NEW DELHI; 9TH JULY, 2012 Page 3 ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.8

SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 146 OF 2012 IN APPEAL(CRL) 732/2011 PAYAL MALIK Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

NAGESH MALIK Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing records of Crl.Appeal No.732/2011 and office report ) Date: 09/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR.

PRASAD For Petitioner(s) Mr.Randhir Singh Jain, Adv. Mr.Dhananjai Jain, Adv. Ms.Ruchika Jain, Adv. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Basava Prabhu Patil, Sr.Adv. Mr.Dharam Raj, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Contempt Petition is disposed of, in terms of the signed order. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) (signed order is placed on the file)