Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 17.01.2025
AJIT KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr Bhanu Gupta, Adv. and Mr. Utkarsh Kandpal, Advs.
Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Ms. Shivani Yadav, Ms. Nishu Dagar and Mr. Aditya Shukla, Advs.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
JUDGMENT
1. This review petition has been filed seeking a review of Order dated 31.01.2022 passed by this Court whereby the respondents were directed to treat the writ petition as a representation of the petitioners and to extend to them the same relief as granted to SI/GD Vinod Kumar by this Court vide its Judgment dated 04.02.2019, passed in W.P.(C) No. 7577/2016 titled SI GD Vinod Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
2. The learned counsel for the review petitioners submits that the W.P.(C) 1826/2022 petitioners in the main petition were not entitled to the same relief.
3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents in the review petition, that is, petitioners in the main petition, places reliance on the Order dated 26.02.2020 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Review Petition no. 81/2020 in W.P.(C) NO. 9094/2019 titled Mahendra Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., to submit that a similar review petition has been dismissed by this Court, and the order was upheld by the Supreme Court while dismissing the Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 1692-1693/2021 titled Union of India & Ors. v. Mahendra Singh & Ors., vide its Order dated 03.09.2021.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents in the review petition, we do not find any merit in the present review petition. The same along with pending application is, accordingly, dismissed.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J JANUARY 17, 2025/ss/sk/DG Click here to check corrigendum, if any