Estate Officer, U.T. Chandigarh v. Rajan Soi

Supreme Court of India · 12 Oct 2012
H.L. Dattu
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 423 OF 2008
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Supreme Court condoned delay and allowed restoration of a civil appeal subject to a conditional deposit, emphasizing procedural compliance in restoration applications.

Full Text
Translation output
Page 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
I.A.NOS.2 & 3
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 423 OF 2008
ESTATE OFFICER, U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. APPELLANTS
VERSUS
RAJAN SOI & ORS. RESPONDENTS
Delay in filing the application for restoration is condoned.
Prayer made in I.A.No.2/2012 – for restoration of appeal is granted. Accordingly, the order passed by this Court on 05.12.2011 is recalled, subject to the appellant depositing a sum of Rs.3,000/- with the Supreme Court Employees' Mutual
Welfare Fund within three weeks' time from today. If such deposit is not made, the earlier order passed by this Court stands restored. .......................J.
(H.L. DATTU)
NEW DELHI;
OCTOBER 12, 2012
Page 2
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION IV
(IN CHAMBERS)
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A.Nos.2 & 3 in
CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 423 OF 2008
ESTATE OFFICER, U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. Appellant (s)
VERSUS
RAJAN SOI & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for restoration,c/delay in filing application for restoration and office report )
Date: 12/10/2012 These Applns. were called on for hearing
today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU
For Appellant(s) Mr.Sangram S.Saron, Adv. for Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. M.C. Dhingra,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
I.A.Nos.2 & 3 are allowed, in terms of the signed order.
(G.V.Ramana) (Indu Satija)
(signed order is placed on the file)
JUDGMENT