Dr. Vishal Bapusaheb Desai v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 01 Jul 2026 · 2026:DHC:5285-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Vinod Kumar
W.P.(C) 8540/2026
2026:DHC:5285-DB
administrative other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition while leaving open the question of the Tribunal's interpretation of Section 20 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 for future consideration.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 8540/2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 8540/2026 & CM APPL. 39649/2026
DR. VISHAL BAPUSAHEB DESAI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. T. R. Mohanty and Mr. T. S. Taggar, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh and Ms. Shriya Sharma, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
ORDER (ORAL)
01.07.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. After some hearing, Mr. Mohanty, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition but prays that the issue regarding the correctness of the view adopted by the Tribunal regarding Section 20 of the Administrative Tribunal Act 1985[1] may be left open.

2. Accordingly, leaving the question of Section 20 of the AT Act open for consideration in an appropriate matter, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.