Bijender Kumar and Ors. v. The State Govt of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 28 Jul 2026 · 2026:DHC:6080
Manoj Jain
CRL.M.C. 5297/2026
2026:DHC:6080
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on amicable settlement and the complainant's no objection, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS, 2023.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 5297/2026 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 28th July, 2026
CRL.M.C. 5297/2026
BIJENDER KUMAR AND ORS.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Naronter Singh and Mr. Prayash, Advocates.
VERSUS
THE STATE GOVT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajkumar, APP for State along with SI Anuj More and ASI Sanjay
Kumar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 671/2024 dated 05.11.2024, registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 08.12.2022, as per Hindu rites and customs. No child is born out of the abovesaid wedlock.

3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties started residing separately. CRL.M.C. 5297/2026 2

4. On account of matrimonial discord, a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, which resulted into registration of the abovesaid FIR.

5. Fortunately, when the parties were referred for counselling, both the parties amicably resolved all their disputes before Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 15.11.2025 and are now enjoying life together.

6. It is in the abovesaid backdrop that quashing is being sought.

7. Petitioners are present in-person.

8. Respondent no. 2 is also present in-person and she has been duly identified by her counsel as well as by Investigating Officer.

9. When asked, respondent No.2 submitted that the matter has been amicably settled and she is residing with her husband in complete peace and harmony for last 6-7 months. She submits that since she has, voluntarily, entered into settlement and is happy at her matrimonial home, she would have ‘no objection’ if FIR in question is quashed. Her affidavit to abovesaid effect is also on record.

10. Keeping in mind the overall facts of the case and the fact that respondent No.2 is residing happily at her matrimonial home and does not want any further action against any of the petitioners, continuing with criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose, especially, when the couple is now enjoying matrimonial bliss. Moreover, the dispute does not involve any public interest and is private in nature.

11. Accordingly, exercising inherent powers vested in this Court under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, it is deemed appropriate to quash the instant FIR.

12. Consequently, to secure the ends of justice, FIR No. 671/2024 dated 05.11.2024, registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, Delhi, for CRL.M.C. 5297/2026 3 commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed.

13. The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

JUDGE JULY 28, 2026/nr/sa