Toshniwal Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd. and Anr v. Singhla Autotech Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 07 May 2026 · 2026:DHC:4027
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
CM(M) 940/2026
2026:DHC:4027
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court reduced the costs imposed on the petitioners and disposed of their petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to raise jurisdictional objections before the Trial Court.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 940/2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 07th May, 2026
CM(M) 940/2026 & CM APPL. 27755/2026
TOSHNIWAL AUTO PARTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Shreedhar Gaggar, Advocate.
VERSUS
SINGHLA AUTOTECH PVT. LTD. .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Shashank Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shreyas Malik and Ms. Adhya Antya, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
ORDER (Oral)
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.
JUDGMENT

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter is now fixed for final arguments before the learned Trial Court, so the petitioners are not pressing the present petition and the same be disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to advance these arguments as to the jurisdiction of the Trial Court at the time of final arguments. However, relief be granted to set aside the impugned order as to the imposition of the costs of Rs. 1,00,000/upon the petitioners, as the same is erroneous and unreasonable.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the respondent submits that the Court may take a decision on this aspect of costs and that he has nothing further to say in this respect. CM(M) 940/2026

4. Keeping in view these submissions, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed, in accordance with law. However, the costs of Rs. 1,00,000/- imposed upon the petitioners vide the impugned order is reduced to Rs. 50,000/-. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 7, 2026/nd/abk