Ex WG Cdr Suman Kumar v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 30 Jan 2025 · 2025:DHC:549-DB
Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur
W.P.(C) 1195/2025
2025:DHC:549-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking direction to the Armed Forces Tribunal for expeditious hearing of a dismissal-from-service challenge, holding that tribunal scheduling is beyond the court's interference under Article 226.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C) 1195/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 30.01.2025
W.P.(C) 1195/2025
EX WG CDR SUMAN KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Dr.Abhay Kant Upadhyay, Mr.Madan Pal Vats, Mr.Naveen
Kumar Gautam, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents
Through: Mr.Avtaar Singh Deol, SPC, Mr.Jitendra Kr. Tripathi, GP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 5784/2025 (Exemption)
JUDGMENT

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1195/2025 & CM APPL. 5783/2025

2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, challenging the Orders dated 08.05.2024 and 03.07.2024, passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AFT’), in OA No. 2348/2023, titled EX WG CDR Suman Kumar v. Union of India And Others.

3. The above Original Application has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Order dated 26.04.2023, passed by the respondents, whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from the services.

4. By the Impugned Order dated 08.05.2023, the learned AFT has WP(C) 1195/2025 directed that the Original Application filed by the petitioner be listed for final hearing as per seriatim. By the Impugned Order dated 03.07.2024, the application, being M.A.2418/2024, filed by the petitioner for seeking an expeditious hearing of the Original Application, has been dismissed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, having been dismissed from the service, is facing an acute financial burden and, therefore, his petition should be taken up out of turn for hearing by the learned AFT.

6. We are afraid that we cannot pass such a direction in the exercise of our power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is for the learned AFT to consider the position of its Board and to determine which matters would require an expedited hearing. The petitioners herein cannot seek preferential treatment over other similarly placed petitioners before the learned Tribunal, who may also be challenging their order of dismissal from service.

7. We, therefore, dismiss the present petition. The pending application is also disposed of being rendered infructuous.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J JANUARY 30, 2025 Click here to check corrigendum, if any