Rashmi Gupta v. Kanika

Delhi High Court · 12 May 2026 · 2026:DHC:4319
Sachin Datta
CONT.CAS(C) 849/2026
2026:DHC:4319
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition alleging wilful disobedience after the MCD undertook to comply with the Court's earlier directions within a specified timeframe and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

Full Text
Translation output
CONT.CAS(C) 849/2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 RASHMI GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aditya and Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocates.
VERSUS
MS. KANIKA AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Shoumendu Mukherji, Senior Panel Counsel along with Ms. Meghna Sharma, Mr. Aniruddha Ghosh, Ms. Surabhi Tuli, Advocates for R-3.
Ms. Puja S. Kalra, Adv. for MCD.
SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Kashmere Gate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 13.10.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 15639/2025.

2. Learned counsel for the MCD submits, on instructions, that the requisite decision in terms of the aforesaid directions is in the process of being taken and the said process shall be concluded within a period of five days from today.

3. It is assured and undertaken that the requisite decision that would be taken in terms of the said order, shall be communicated to the petitioner latest within a period of three weeks from today.

4. Taking on record the aforesaid undertaking, the present petition is disposed of.

5. Needless to say, if the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the aforesaid exercise, she shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedies available under law.

SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 12, 2026