Indu Prakash Pharmacy College v. Anil Mittal

Delhi High Court · 18 May 2026 · 2026:DHC:4512
Sachin Datta
CONT.CAS(C) 900/2026
2026:DHC:4512
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions against Pharmacy Council officials on their undertaking to comply with prior directions within one week, warning that breach would attract contempt proceedings.

Full Text
Translation output
CONT.CAS(C) 900/2026 & Connected Matter
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 18.05.2026
CONT.CAS(C) 900/2026
JUDGMENT
(129)
INDU PRAKASH PHARMACY COLLEGE.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat (Sr. Adv) along with Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advs.
VERSUS
MR. ANIL MITTAL, REGISTRAR-CUM MEMBER SECRETARY, PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR.....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetanya Singh, Mr. Chetan Sharma, Advs. + CONT.CAS(C) 904/2026 (171)
SRLT INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY AND MANAGEMENT.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat (Sr. Adv) along with Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advs.
VERSUS
MR ANIL MITTAL AND ANR.....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetanya Singh, Mr. Chetan Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)

1. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 13.04.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 3166/2026 & other connected matters. The operative directions therein are as under:-

2. Issue notice.

3. Learned counsel, as aforesaid, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. After some hearing, learned counsel for the respondents assures and undertakes on instructions that the aforesaid directions shall be complied with and the necessary exercise shall be completed within a period of one week from today. The said statement and undertaking is taken on record. The respondent shall remain bound by the said undertaking.

5. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

6. It is made clear that any breach of the aforesaid undertaking shall be construed as wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court entailing severe action under the Section 2(b) read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

7. In case of any breach, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the present proceedings.

SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 18, 2026