Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 23rd May, 2026
VIJAY KUMAR DIWAKAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Mr. Vikal Chardela and Mr. Shivam Chaudhary, Advs.
Through: Mr. Ajjay Arora, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kapil Dutta and Mr. Vansh Luthra, Advs. for R-1 & R-2.
Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel ( Civil) GNCTD, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Adv. for GNCTD.
Mr. Kailash Vasudev,Sr. Adv. with Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur (standing counsel), Ms. Deeksha L. Kakar
(Panel Lawyer), Mr. Aditya Verma, Mr. Rashneet Singh, Ms. Sana Parveen, Advs. AlongwithDr.
Mannan Akhtar, Commissioner (LM), Mr. Ajay Kadian, Director
(LM-II), Mr. Pradeep Kumar, AD (LMCordination), Mr. DurganandMinz, DD (GIS), Mr. Mayank Yadav, (Tehsildar Nazul), Mr. Bijndra Kumar, DD
(Horticulture). for DDA.
Mr. Kamal Kant Jha,CGSC with Mr.Aishwarya Deep Singh and Ms. Aakriti, Advs.
Mr. Bhagvan Swamp Shukla CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar, Mr. Mukesh Pandey, Advs. for UOI.
Ms. Thara,Additional Secretary.
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
JUDGMENT
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. In this case, various issues concerning the Zone `O’ area are being monitored by this Court. The Court had noticed unabated unauthorised construction in the area and from the submissions made, it had become clear that there were several unauthorised colonies which had come up in the said area. One of the stands of the Government was that these colonies are protected under the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Act, 2011. On this issue, the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter, ‘DDA’) had sought a clarification from the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs, Government of India (hereinafter, ‘Ministry’) and a meeting was directed vide order dated 28th March, 2026. However, the Ministry had taken an extremely ambiguous position in the said meeting. The Ministry vide affidavit dated 15th April, 2026 clarified that the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Act 2011 provides for maintenance of status quo in respect of unauthorised colonies identified under 2019 Regulations, however, the same does not explicitly include or exclude Zone ‘O’. The said affidavit filed by the Ministry was unclear as to the status of the unauthorised colonies in Zone ‘O’. The relevant portion of the said affidavit dated 15th April, 2026 reads as under:
3. Accordingly, vide order dated 18th April, 2026, this Court directed as under:
12. From the above, it is unclear as to what the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs of India is intending to state by way of a clarification. The question raised by the DDA was whether the maintenance of status quo in respect of unauthorized colonies, as per the National capital Territory of Delhi Laws (special Provisions) Act, 2011, would extend to colonies falling in Zone ‘O’ or not. This issue has not been answered by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs of India.
13. In view thereof, let Ms. D. Thara, Additional Secretary
(D) who had chaired the said meeting be present on the next date of hearing. A fresh affidavit shall also be filed by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs of India in this regard.”
4. In view of the stand of the MoHUA being unclear, the Court had directed Ms. D. Thara, Additional Secretary to be present today. The said officer has joined the proceedings virtually.
5. Insofar as the unauthorised colonies in Zone ‘O’ which are 91 in number, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has filed an affidavit dated 11th May, 2026. The said affidavit also deals with other unauthorised colonies in Delhi as well. The said affidavit is sworn by Mr. Upendra Kumar Tiwari, Under Secretary, Delhi Division, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. The relevant portions of the said affidavit is set out below:
6. Mr. Chetan Sharma, ld. ASG has appeared along with Ms. Thara, Additional Secretary. After hearing the submissions, it is clear that insofar as the unauthorised colonies in Delhi, are concerned, on 8th April, 2026 the said colonies were regularised on as is where is basis. However, this does not include colonies in Zone ‘O’. Insofar as colonies in Zone ‘O’ are concerned, the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Act 2011 protects the occupants of unauthorised colonies in Zone ‘O’ till 31st December, 2026.
7. On a query from the Court, it is informed that the Government of India is presently in discussion with various Departments including the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘GNCTD’) regarding the manner in which Zone ‘O’ is to be treated and how the colonies including some villages where there was habitation for several years are to be dealt with. The Additional Secretary also submits that there is discussion in respect of rehabilitation of these villages and residents as well. Since there are approximately 5 to 6 lakhs people living in these 91 colonies, which would translate into at least 1 lakh houses, a detailed strategy would have to be worked out.
8. Insofar as Zone ‘O’ is concerned, the same is part of the Yamuna Flood Plains. This Court is of the opinion that the existence of any residential colonies in Zone ‘O’ would be completely impermissible and would also not be conducive to the environment as also to the river bed area. The MoHUA and other Ministries in the GOI, therefore, need to take an urgent decision in this matter inasmuch as the protection from punitive action exists only till 31st December, 2026 for these residents. At this stage, the Additional Secretary submits that no ownership is being granted to the residents of these 91 colonies and no fresh construction is also permissible in this area.
9. The Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter, ‘DDA’)DDA is the Agency to oversee and ensure that no fresh construction takes place in Zone ‘O’ including in these colonies even under the garb of repair or renovation.
10. The MoHUA - Government of India shall, accordingly, place before this Court the decision in respect of the 91 colonies in Zone ‘O’ by the next date of hearing. Let an affidavit by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs be placed on record after holding proper consultations with all the Departments and other stakeholders if required.
11. Ms. Thara, Additional Secretary to continue to join these proceedings either physically or virtually.
12. Mr. Ajay Kadian, Director Land Management, DDA has also presented a status report to show the action which has been taken in respect of Zone ‘O’. The said status report states as under:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Sl. Name of Agency Total of notice boards │ │ No. installed. │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 1. DDA 114 │ │ 2. MCD 10 │ │ 3. DMRC 1 │ │ 4. I&FC 51 │ │ 5. Forest Department Floated tender for │ │ installing Public Notice │ │ Boards. │ │ 6. GNCTD Information not │ │ received │ │ 7. Delhi Police. Information not │ │ received │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘