Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 20.04.2026
12234/2026 MAMRAJ .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Akhil Rexwal and Mr. Aditya, Advocates.
Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State.
JUDGMENT
1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 78/2026 of PS Pul Prahlad Pur for offence under Section 110/3(5) BNS.
2. It is 01:25 pm. This interim bail application has been received by way of second supplementary list after mentioning was allowed by the Hon’ble Chief Justice.
3. At the outset, learned APP points out that the accused/applicant has not disclosed that his regular bail application is already pending before the trial court and is listed on 28.04.2026. As pointed out by learned APP, the BAIL APPLN. 1527/2026 pages trial court rejected the interim bail application on the ground that the marriage in question is not of an immediate family member of the accused/applicant and allegations against the accused/applicant are of serious nature.
4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant does not dispute that the bail application of the accused/applicant is pending before the Court of Sessions and this fact has not been disclosed in the present bail application. But learned counsel is unable to explain the reason behind concealment of pendency of bail application before the Court of Sessions.
5. The present interim bail application is dismissed in the above circumstances.
6. Accompanying applications also stand disposed of.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) APRIL 20, 2026