Sunita Devi v. Parveen Kumar Director General, BSF & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 21 Apr 2026 · 2026:DHC:3477
Sachin Datta
CONT.CAS(C) 675/2026
2026:DHC:3477
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with pension and compensation orders after respondents demonstrated partial compliance and gave an undertaking to expedite payment.

Full Text
Translation output
CONT.CAS(C) 675/2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 SUNITA DEVI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sahil Chandra and Ms. Amrita Singh, Advs.
VERSUS
PARVEEN KUMAR DIRECTOR GENERAL, BSF & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Ravindra Vikram Singh, SPC and Mr. Ratan Prakash, GP, UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.25871/2026 (Exemption)

2. Application stands disposed of.

3. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the judgment / order dated 26.03.2025, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 12256/2022, in terms whereof, the petitioner is entitled to extraordinary pension and ex-gratia compensation.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, submits that the ex-gratia compensation to which the petitioner is entitled, has already been disbursed. It is further submitted that for grant of extra ordinary pension, the matter has been forwarded to the Pay and Accounts Department (PAD).

5. It is assured and undertaken that the matter shall be rigorously followed up to ensure that the extra ordinary pension is granted/ released to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.

6. In view of the aforesaid, this Court finds no occasion to pass any further orders in the present contempt petition. The same is, accordingly disposed of, taking on record the aforesaid undertaking of the respondents.

7. The respondents are directed to file a compliance affidavit within a period of eight weeks from today.

SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 21, 2026