Nisha Sharma & Anr. v. Arvind Kumar Gogia

Delhi High Court · 29 Apr 2026 · 2026:DHC:3631
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
CM(M) 4219/2024
2026:DHC:3631
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed as infructuous a petition under Article 227 challenging an interim order after the main petition had been disposed of by the Trial Court.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 4219/2024
$~26
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 29th April, 2026
+ CM(M) 4219/2024, CM APPL. 76356/2024 &CM APPL. 76357/2024
NISHA SHARMA &ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Saumya Tandon and Mr. Gaurav
Singh, Advocates.
VERSUS
ARVIND KUMAR GOGIA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh Bawa and Mr. Nilesh Sawhney, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
ORDER (Oral)
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.
JUDGMENT

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the judgment dated 05th March, 2024 passed by the learned Appellate Court in MCA DJ No. 20/2018.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that that the present petition has become infructuous, as the main petition has already been disposed of vide judgment dated 17th March, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court, and in the present petition, the challenge is to the interim order passed on the application under Order XXXIX Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

4. Keeping in view these submissions, the present petition is disposed of CM(M) 4219/2024 as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 29, 2026/v/abk