Home Residency Infratech Pvt Ltd v. Surjeet Singh Gehlaut

Delhi High Court · 27 Apr 2026 · 2026:DHC:3675
Sachin Datta
CONT.CAS(C) 1103/2023
2026:DHC:3675
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging disobedience of an interim order, holding that such grievances must be raised within the pending civil suit and not through separate contempt proceedings.

Full Text
Translation output
CONT.CAS(C) 1103/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 27.04.2026
CONT.CAS(C) 1103/2023 and CM APPL.1308/2024
HOME RESIDENCY INFRATECH PVT LTD. THROUGH ITS
DIRECTOR DEEPANSH KALRA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Samridhi Arora and Ms. Sanjana, Advs.
VERSUS
SURJEET SINGH GEHLAUT AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Bal Kishan Bhatia, Ms. Nupur and Mr. Mandeep Kumar, Advs. for
R-1 to 13.
Mr. Vikrant Nath Goyal, Ms. Satvika Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya and Mr. Inderpreet Singh, Advs. for Delhi
Police.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. The present petition alleges contempt / wilful disobedience of the order dated 30.08.2022, passed by ADJ-05 (SW), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in CS No.808/2022.

2. It transpires that the civil suit is still pending consideration.

3. In the circumstances, assuming there has been any wilful disobedience of the interim order during subsistence thereof, it is open for the petitioner to agitate the said aspect in the ongoing civil proceedings, and seek appropriate directions. CONT.CAS(C) 1103/2023

4. Considering the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present contempt petition.

5. The same is accordingly, disposed of. However, the right of the petitioner to raise any plea as may be permissible under law, in the ongoing civil proceedings, is reserved.

APRIL 27, 2026/cl SACHIN DATTA, J