Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 06th February, 2026
DAYA NAND .....Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person.
Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Bheru Sahai, DIU/Outer
Distt.
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner appears in person and challenges order dated 20.11.2025 passed by learned Revisional Court.
2. It seems that his main grievance is to the effect that, one Meena Devi should have also been charge-sheeted which is based on his report i.e. FIR 7/2022, registered at P.S. Mundka.
3. However, the order of learned Revisional Court does not seem to be adverse to the petitioner, as the learned Revisional Court, while deciding Crl.Rev.P.143/2025 in its order dated 20.11.2025, has observed as under:-
4. The petitioner was earlier aggrieved by order dated 19.02.2025 passed by the concerned Magisterial Court, whereby his right to file written arguments on the aspect of charge was closed.
5. The abovesaid order passed by learned Revisional Court would, clearly, indicate that he has been given a specific right in this regard and can always place on record his written submissions before the concerned Magisterial Court.
6. In view of the above, after some arguments, the petitioner does not press the present petition. He, however, submits that he may be given liberty to challenge the order on charge, if the charges are not ascertained in consonance with the averments and allegations appearing in the charge-sheet.
7. The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. Liberty, as prayed, is always with the petitioner.
8. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.
9. Pending application also stands disposed of.
10. Copy of the order be given dasti under signatures of Court Master.
JUDGE FEBRUARY 6, 2026/st/sa