Sohail Saifi & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 09 Feb 2026 · 2026:DHC:1136
Manoj Jain
CRL.M.C. 1096/2026
2026:DHC:1136
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under BNS/IPC offences based on a voluntary compromise and the complainant's withdrawal, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 1096/2026 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 9th February, 2026
CRL.M.C. 1096/2026
SOHAIL SAIFI & ORS. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arif Hussain, Advocate along with petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Akshay Dagar.
Mr. Mohd. Talat, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 345/2025 dated 27.08.2025, registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh, Delhi for commission of offences under Sections 75/ 85/ 316(2)/ 351(2)/ 3(5), BNS (corresponding Sections 354A/ 498A/ 406/ 506/ 34 IPC), along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 17.12.2023 according to Muslim rites and customs. CRL.M.C. 1096/2026 2

3. However, on account of some matrimonial dispute, respondent No.2 reported the matter to police which resulted in registration of abovesaid FIR.

4. Though chargesheet has already been filed against all the petitioners, charges are yet to be framed.

5. Both the sides have entered into settlement and have started living together in complete harmony and, therefore, the present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR.

6. Respondent No.2 is present in person and she has been duly identified by IO.

7. She reiterates the terms of settlement and submits that she is living happily with her husband and in-laws and she does not want any further action and would have no objection if the FIR in question is quashed. She submits that she has entered into settlement voluntarily and without any force. Her affidavit, to said effect, is also on record. She also submits that all her istridhan articles are with her and she is left with no grievance against any of the petitioners.

8. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, continuing with criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose, especially, when dispute does not involve any public interest and is, primarily, private in nature. In any case, even the complainant does not wish to press any charges against the petitioners.

9. Accordingly, exercising inherent powers vested in this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS, it is deemed appropriate to quash the instant FIR.

10. Consequently, to secure the ends of justice, FIR No. 345/2025 dated 27.08.2025, registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh, Delhi for commission of offences under Sections 75/ 85/ 316(2)/ 351(2)/ 3(5), BNS (corresponding CRL.M.C. 1096/2026 3 Sections 354A/ 498A/ 406/ 506/ 34 IPC), along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby, quashed.

11. The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

12. Pending application also stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

JUDGE FEBRUARY 9, 2026/sw/pb