Hari Singh Pawar v. Union of India and Ors

Delhi High Court · 10 Feb 2025 · 2025:DHC:879-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
W.P.(C) 1606/2025
2025:DHC:879-DB
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition with a clarification that interim observations by the Central Administrative Tribunal are tentative and not binding at the final hearing.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 1606/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 1606/2025, CM APPL. 7820/2025 & CM APPL.
7821/2025 HARI SINGH PAWAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Shukla, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, CGSC
WITH
Mr. Arnav Mittal, GP
WITH
Mr. Sandip Munian and Ms. Jyotsna Vyas, Advs. for R1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
10.02.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. After some hearing, Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition, and merely seeks an observation that the Central Administrative Tribunal[1] would not be bound by the observations and findings contained in the impugned order when the OA is finally heard.

2. Needless to say, as the impugned order is interim in nature, the views expressed therein would only be tentative and all aspects would “Tribunal” hereinafter W.P.(C) 1606/2025 be open to be urged before the Tribunal when the OA is finally heard.

3. With the above clarification, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. FEBRUARY 10, 2025 ar Click here to check corrigendum, if any