Shrisanatan Dharam Secondary School (Gujrat) Kirti Nagar v. Parul Bharti

Delhi High Court · 15 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:7701
Valmiki J. Mehta
W.P.(C) 230/2013
2013:DHC:7701
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging condonation of delay and allowed the petitioner to seek further time from the Delhi School Tribunal to file replies.

Full Text
Translation output
i i.27 & 28 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.CC) 230/2013
SHRISANATAN DHARAM SECONDARY SCHOOL (GUJRAT)KIRTI
NAGAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. S. Mukherjee and Mr. Anil Sehgal, Advocates.
VERSUS
PARUL BHARTI Respondent
Through
W.P.(C1231/2013
SHRI SANATAN DHARAM SECONDARY SCHOOL (GUJRAT)KIRTI
NAGAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. S. Mukherjee and Mr. Anil Sehgal, Advocates.
VERSUS
RAJTV BHARTI Respondent
Through
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA
15.01.2013
ORDER

1. These writ petitions impugn the order of the Delhi School Tribunal dated[3].10.2012 condoning the delay in challenging the orderof termination of services. W.P.(C) 230-231/2013 page 1 of[2] \ 2013:DHC:7701 ly

2. Counsel for the petitioner, very fairly, does not press these writ petitions but states that the petitioner be given further time then as granted by the impugned order to file the written statement/replyto the appeals.

3. The aforesaid writ petitions are therefore disposed of by entitling the petitioner to make a request before the Delhi School Tribunal in the appeals which are stated to be listed tomorrow for seeking further time offour weeks to file the writtenstatement/reply to theseappeals, andon suchrequestbeing made, the Delhi School Tribunal will consider the same most favourably.

4. Nothing contained in today's order is a reflection on merits of the cases ofeither ofthe parties before the Delhi School Tribunal.

5. Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid observations.

JANUARY 15,2013/ib VALMIKIJ. MEHTA, J