Commissioner of Value Added Tax v. M/s. Carzonrent India Pvt Ltd

Delhi High Court · 17 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:304-DB
S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar
ST.APPL. 5/2011
2013:DHC:304-DB
tax appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that VAT assessments must comply with procedural and substantive statutory requirements, setting aside orders where lapses occurred and allowing a cross-appeal by a taxpayer.

Full Text
Translation output
ST.APPL.4/11, 5/11, 6/11, 7/11, 8/11, 9/11 & 16/11 Page 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RESERVED ON: 27.09.2012 PRONOUNCED ON: 17.01.2013
ST.APPL. 5/2011
COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent
ST.APPL. 6/2011
VERSUS
M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent
ST.APPL. 7/2011, C.M. APPL. 10492/2011 & Cross Appeal
13377/2012
VERSUS
M/S. A L D AUTOMATIVE PVT LTD ..... Respondent
ST.APPL. 8/2011
COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
M/S. L & T FINANCE LTD ..... Respondent
ST.APPL. 9/2011
VERSUS
M/S. DIGITECH SYSTEMS ..... Respondent 2013:DHC:304-DB
ST.APPL.4/11, 5/11, 6/11, 7/11, 8/11, 9/11 & 16/11 Page 2
ST.APPL. 16/2011
CARZONRENT (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent
Through: Sh. Parag. P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Monisha Handa, Advocates, for VAT.
Through : Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Ruchir Bhatia and Sh. Arnav Kumar, Advocates.
Sh. Vineet Bhatia, Advocate.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR
MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT The above mentioned matters have been decided on 17.01.2013. For detailed
JUDGMENT
, the decision dated 17.01.2013 in St.Appl. 4/2011 may be referred to.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE)
R.V. EASWAR (JUDGE)
JANUARY 17, 2013 2013:DHC:304-DB