Full Text
Translation output
$- HIGH COURT OF DELHI T co.A(sB ) 2 or zor3 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ashish Deep Verma, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Swati Setia, Advocate for RBI.
Through: Mr. Ashish Deep Verma, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Swati Setia, Advocate for RBI.
VERSUS
JVG FINANCE LTD (SARITA DEVI) ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for OL.
Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for OL.
WITH
)q ,/ ,/ .,2 CO.A(SB) 3 of 2013 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant
Ms. Swati Setia. Advocate for RBI.
Ms. Swati Setia. Advocate for RBI.
VERSUS
JVG FII'{A}ICE LTD (SANGITA DEVI) ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocbte for OL.
AND
30.
CO.A(SB) 4 of 2013 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA APPellant:
Ms. Swati Setia. Advocate for RBI.
CO.A. (SB) Nos.2,3 and 4 of 2013 Page I of 2 2013:DHC:8290
./ ,t -/ L/ o
Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocbte for OL.
AND
30.
CO.A(SB) 4 of 2013 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA APPellant:
Ms. Swati Setia. Advocate for RBI.
CO.A. (SB) Nos.2,3 and 4 of 2013 Page I of 2 2013:DHC:8290
./ ,t -/ L/ o
VERSUS
JVG FINANCE LTD (SHIV KUMAR) ""' Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for OL'
Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for OL'
CORAM: JUSTTCE S. MURALIDHAR
23.01.2013
ORDER
1. The clelay in filing the claim Form 66 before the official Liquidator ('OL') is condo;^ed.
2. Learned counsel for the Appellant refers to the Annexures to the application and states. that the claim Fornr 66 was attested prior to 31" october 2002. Notwithstanding the above form stated to have been already filed with the OL, the Appellants are permitted to file the claims afresh in Form 66 togethei with all the original documents within a period of four rveeks from today. If the claims are so lodged, the OL will examine and process thern on merits.
3. The appeals are disposed of in the above terms' S.MURALIDHAR, J JANUARY 23,2013 dn CO-\. (SB) Nos.2,[3] and 4 of 2013 Page 2 of[2]