Full Text
Translation output
H
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
WP (C) No.549/2013 M/S. AGARPARA JUTE LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Adv.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
WP (C) No.549/2013 M/S. AGARPARA JUTE LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Adv.
VERSUS
BIFR & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit S. Chadha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Atanu Mukherjee, Adv. for R-2.
Mr. C. Mukund & Ms. Indram Mukherjee, Advs. for ACL.
Mr. Pradeep Agarwal, Adv. for Mr. Ghanshyam Sarda.
Through: Mr. Amit S. Chadha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Atanu Mukherjee, Adv. for R-2.
Mr. C. Mukund & Ms. Indram Mukherjee, Advs. for ACL.
Mr. Pradeep Agarwal, Adv. for Mr. Ghanshyam Sarda.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
30.01.2013 Caveat Nos.85-86/2013 Learned counsels for the caveators have entered appearance and, thus, the caveats stand discharged.
IAT (C) No.549/2013 & CM No. 1037/2013 Learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on 'instructions, states that some factual 'inaccuracies have crept *in the pleadm i gs of this petition as apparently the pleadm i gs have been predicated on the pleadm i gs of WP (C)
No.550/2013 listed today. He fairly concedes that there is no appeal pending before the AAIFR filed by the present petitioner unlike the case of the petitioner
WP (C) No.54912013 Page I of 2 2013:DHC:7802-DB a in WP (C) No.550/2013 but to the contrary the appeal of the petitioner herein stands dismissed right till the Supreme Court.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions, that he does not seek to press the writ petition but would like to avail of the legal remedy as may be available before the AAIFR in accordance with law against the impugned order.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
0--4" ^^ --- SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
JANUARY 30,2013 IND !T KAUR, J. b 'nesh ( If WP (C) No. 54912013
2013:DHC:7802-DB
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
30.01.2013 Caveat Nos.85-86/2013 Learned counsels for the caveators have entered appearance and, thus, the caveats stand discharged.
IAT (C) No.549/2013 & CM No. 1037/2013 Learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on 'instructions, states that some factual 'inaccuracies have crept *in the pleadm i gs of this petition as apparently the pleadm i gs have been predicated on the pleadm i gs of WP (C)
No.550/2013 listed today. He fairly concedes that there is no appeal pending before the AAIFR filed by the present petitioner unlike the case of the petitioner
WP (C) No.54912013 Page I of 2 2013:DHC:7802-DB a in WP (C) No.550/2013 but to the contrary the appeal of the petitioner herein stands dismissed right till the Supreme Court.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions, that he does not seek to press the writ petition but would like to avail of the legal remedy as may be available before the AAIFR in accordance with law against the impugned order.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
0--4" ^^ --- SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
JANUARY 30,2013 IND !T KAUR, J. b 'nesh ( If WP (C) No. 54912013
2013:DHC:7802-DB
JUDGMENT