SH v. K.L. Sharma

Delhi High Court · 18 Feb 2013
Valmiki J. Mehta
W.P.(C) No. 986/2013
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions against NDPL on the ground of delay and laches, relying on the reasoning in a lead case.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P(C) 986/2013 & conn. matters
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) No. 986/2013 & conn.
18th February, 2013
JUDGMENT

1. W.P.(C) No. 986/2013 SH.

VERSUS

2. W.P.(C) No. 1015/2013 K.L.SHARMA...... Petitioner

VERSUS

NDPL & ANR....... Respondents Thro9ugh: Mr. Abhay Kumar and Mr. U.P.Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. V.C.Jha, and Ms. Sonia Sharma, Adv. for R-2.

3. W.P.(C) No. 1020/2013 DEEPAK MOHAN SETHI...... Petitioner

VERSUS

4. W.P.(C) No. 1036/2013 S.P.CHAWLA...... Petitioner

VERSUS

CORAM: HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. I have decided identical batch of petitions on 15.02.2013. The lead case decided is the case titled as Suresh Garg Vs. NDPL & Anr. in W.P.(C) NO. 919/2013. I have dismissed the writ petitions on the ground of delay and laches. Adopting the reasoning contained in the aforesaid batch of cases with lead case titled as Suresh Garg Vs. NDPL & Anr. in W.P.(C) No. 919/2013, the present petitions are also dismissed.

2. Copy of the aforesaid judgment in W.P.(C) No.919/2013 be placed on the files of these cases.

FEBRUARY 18, 2013 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J. ib