Full Text
Translation output
$-24 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 4611/2012
MAHESH PRASAD Petitioner
Through Mr. Bahar U. Barqi, Advocate
W.P.(C) 4611/2012
MAHESH PRASAD Petitioner
Through Mr. Bahar U. Barqi, Advocate
VERSUS
NDMCANDANR. ....Respondents
Through Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, ASC for NDMC.
[25]
Through Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, ASC for NDMC.
[25]
W.P.(C)5200/2012
KISHORI LAL Petitioner
Through Mr. Sumit Kr. Singh, Advocate
KISHORI LAL Petitioner
Through Mr. Sumit Kr. Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
N.D.M.C. AND ANR Respondents V Through Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, ASC for NDMC.
Mohd. Noorullah, Advocate for Mr. Anjum Javed, Advocate for respondent
No. 2.
[26]
W.P,(C)5634/2012 SURENDER KHURANA @ NEERU Petitioner
Through Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Advocate
Mohd. Noorullah, Advocate for Mr. Anjum Javed, Advocate for respondent
No. 2.
[26]
W.P,(C)5634/2012 SURENDER KHURANA @ NEERU Petitioner
Through Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Advocate
VERSUS
N.D.M.C. AND ANR Respondents Mr Vikrant Pachnanda, Advocate for
Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel for GNCTD.
[27]
Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel for GNCTD.
[27]
W.P.(C)5667/2012
PREM MASSEY Petitioner
Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Advocate
PREM MASSEY Petitioner
Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Advocate
VERSUS
NDMC Respondent 2013:DHC:6988 [28]
W.P.(C)5696/2012
LALA RAM AND ANR
Through Petitioners Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate
LALA RAM AND ANR
Through Petitioners Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
N.D.M.C. AND ANR
Through [2S]
Through [2S]
W.P.(C)5697/2012
MAUZI @MAZI.... Respondents Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, ASC for NDMC.
Mr. Shariq Mohammad, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
Petitioner
Through Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate
MAUZI @MAZI.... Respondents Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, ASC for NDMC.
Mr. Shariq Mohammad, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
Petitioner
Through Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
Through [30]
W.P.(C)5698/2012
RAJ BAHADUR
Respondents Mr. Shariq Mohammad, Advocate for
Petitioner
Through Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate
RAJ BAHADUR
Respondents Mr. Shariq Mohammad, Advocate for
Petitioner
Through Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
Through Respondents Mr. Shariq Mohammad,Advocate for
CORAM:
HON BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
19.02.2013 r c Counsel for the respondent submits that the Supreme Court has passed an order on 31.01.2013 in connected matters. The operative portion of which reads as unden-
"Till the next date, complete status quo shall be maintained in respect of all those who are engaged in hawking and street vending as on today. Learned Additional
Solicitor General pointed out that the person to whom the sites were allotted on the basis of the lottery draw in 2012 in Connaught Place, Sarojini Nagar and other areas of
NDMC, allotments letters are being issued pursuant to an order passed by the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High
^ Court.
T Since this Court is examining various issues, we deem it proper to direct NDMC not to act upon the direction given by the Delhi High Court till the next date of hearing.
We also request the Delhi High Court not to entertain any petition by or against the hawkers and street vendors till the matter is heard and decided by this Court.
The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court who shall place the same before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the
High Court.
The direction of status quo passed today shall operate in the entire area of NCT of Delhi."
Ifi view of the orders passed by the Apex Court, counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the writ petition at this
/^\ stage. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition if so advised after the final hearing in the matter pending before the Apex Court.
G.S.SISTANI,J FEBRUARY 19, 2013 rs W.P(C) Nos. 4611/2012,5200/2012,5634/2012,5667/2012, 5696/2012,5697/2012 & 5698/2012 3/3
19.02.2013 r c Counsel for the respondent submits that the Supreme Court has passed an order on 31.01.2013 in connected matters. The operative portion of which reads as unden-
"Till the next date, complete status quo shall be maintained in respect of all those who are engaged in hawking and street vending as on today. Learned Additional
Solicitor General pointed out that the person to whom the sites were allotted on the basis of the lottery draw in 2012 in Connaught Place, Sarojini Nagar and other areas of
NDMC, allotments letters are being issued pursuant to an order passed by the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High
^ Court.
T Since this Court is examining various issues, we deem it proper to direct NDMC not to act upon the direction given by the Delhi High Court till the next date of hearing.
We also request the Delhi High Court not to entertain any petition by or against the hawkers and street vendors till the matter is heard and decided by this Court.
The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court who shall place the same before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the
High Court.
The direction of status quo passed today shall operate in the entire area of NCT of Delhi."
Ifi view of the orders passed by the Apex Court, counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the writ petition at this
/^\ stage. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition if so advised after the final hearing in the matter pending before the Apex Court.
G.S.SISTANI,J FEBRUARY 19, 2013 rs W.P(C) Nos. 4611/2012,5200/2012,5634/2012,5667/2012, 5696/2012,5697/2012 & 5698/2012 3/3
JUDGMENT