Full Text
Translation output
'i ,,n $-4 to 8 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M.C. 25261200,9 & Crl. N4A. No,,8494/2009
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. P. S. Thenthingla, Advocate
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. P. S. Thenthingla, Advocate
VERSUS
SANJAY PATIL ..... Respondent
Through: Nemo.
Through: Nemo.
CRL.M.C.2530/2009 & & Crl. M.A. No,8502/2009
Through: Through: Ms. P. S. Thenthingla, Advocate
Through: Through: Ms. P. S. Thenthingla, Advocate
VERSUS
..... Respondent Nemo.
CRL.M.C. 2s32l2009 & Crl.
M.A. No.8506/2009
CRL.M.C. 2s32l2009 & Crl.
M.A. No.8506/2009
VERSUS
TAPATI DAS ..... Respondent MUSTAK SFIAIKH
Through: a Crl. M.C. No,2526/2009 Crl. M.C. No.2530/2009
Crl. M.C. No,2532/2009 Crl, M.C, No.2535/2009
Crl. M,C, No.2542/2009 Page 1 2013:DHC:6818 2.\ in
Through: a Crl. M.C. No,2526/2009 Crl. M.C. No.2530/2009
Crl. M.C. No,2532/2009 Crl, M.C, No.2535/2009
Crl. M,C, No.2542/2009 Page 1 2013:DHC:6818 2.\ in
CRL.M.C. 2535/2009 & Crl.
M.A. NO. 8512/2009
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORATION FINA}ICIAL SERVICES
M.A. NO. 8512/2009
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORATION FINA}ICIAL SERVICES
VERSUS
ASTRA MINING P.LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents CRL.M.C. 254212009 & Crl.M.A. No.8526/2009
GE CAPIAL TANSPORTATION FINANCIL SERVICE LTD. ..... Petitioner
GE CAPIAL TANSPORTATION FINANCIL SERVICE LTD. ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
ASTRA MINING P.LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
19.02.2013 { Counsel appearing for petitioner states that the impugned order upholds the trial court order returning petitioner's complaint on the ground of lack ofjurisdiction.
Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw afore-captioned five petitions unconditionally.
Crl. M.C. No,2526/2009 Crl. M.C. No,2530/2009
CrI. M,C. No.2532/2009 Crl. M,C. No,2535/2009
Crl. M.C. No.Z542/2009 PageZ oh 7Y In view of above, afore-captioned five petitions are dismissed as withdrawn /-F
'' ffiJUDGE FEBRUARY 19, 2OI3 rS )f a Crl. M.C. No.2526/2009
Crl. M.C. No.2530/2009 CrL M,C, No.2532/2009 Crl. M.C. No,2535/2009
Crl. M.C, No.2542/2009 Page 3
19.02.2013 { Counsel appearing for petitioner states that the impugned order upholds the trial court order returning petitioner's complaint on the ground of lack ofjurisdiction.
Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw afore-captioned five petitions unconditionally.
Crl. M.C. No,2526/2009 Crl. M.C. No,2530/2009
CrI. M,C. No.2532/2009 Crl. M,C. No,2535/2009
Crl. M.C. No.Z542/2009 PageZ oh 7Y In view of above, afore-captioned five petitions are dismissed as withdrawn /-F
'' ffiJUDGE FEBRUARY 19, 2OI3 rS )f a Crl. M.C. No.2526/2009
Crl. M.C. No.2530/2009 CrL M,C, No.2532/2009 Crl. M.C. No,2535/2009
Crl. M.C, No.2542/2009 Page 3
JUDGMENT