Full Text
Translation output
$-31 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 363/2013
MUNNA @MEHMOOD Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.K.Pandey, Advocate
W.P.(CRL) 363/2013
MUNNA @MEHMOOD Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.K.Pandey, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE OF(NOT) DELHI Respondent
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
08.03.2013 The grievance made in this petition is that petitioner's application for parole (Annexure-A) has not been decided till date despite reminder
{Annexure-B).
Upon notice learned standing counsel for respondent states that petitioner's application for parole would be decided within two weeks.
Let the needful be done and the fate of petitioner's application be conveyed to petitioner through the concerned Jail Superintendent so that the petitioner may avail ofthe remedy available tohim inlaw.
With aforesaid observations, this petition is disposed of.
-^t^NILGAlfR)^ Judge MARCH 08,2013 mm 2013:DHC:8068
08.03.2013 The grievance made in this petition is that petitioner's application for parole (Annexure-A) has not been decided till date despite reminder
{Annexure-B).
Upon notice learned standing counsel for respondent states that petitioner's application for parole would be decided within two weeks.
Let the needful be done and the fate of petitioner's application be conveyed to petitioner through the concerned Jail Superintendent so that the petitioner may avail ofthe remedy available tohim inlaw.
With aforesaid observations, this petition is disposed of.
-^t^NILGAlfR)^ Judge MARCH 08,2013 mm 2013:DHC:8068
JUDGMENT