Sumati Chand Goutam v. State Through CBI

Delhi High Court · 08 Mar 2013 · 2013:DHC:7643
Sunil Gaur
2013:DHC:7643
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a criminal writ petition with liberty to raise the same issues before the trial court during ongoing proceedings.

Full Text
Translation output
$-11 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(CRL) t87712010 & Crl.
M.A. No. 1882s12010
SUMATI CHAND GOUTAM ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.SudhirNandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr.Pramod Kumar
Dubey, Mr.Amit Mahaj an, Mr.Amit Rathore,Mr.Hemant Shah and Mr.Shiv Chopra, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE THROUGH CBI ..... Respondent
Through: IVIr.P.K.Shatma,Special Public Prosecutor and NIr.Anil Kumar
Singh, Advocate for CBI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR iL
ORDER oh 08.03.2013 Learned senior counsel for petitioner on instructions from petitioner does not press this petition at this stage as most of the prosecution evidence has been recorded and the trial has to proceed on day to day basis from 12th March,2Ol3 and seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberly to raise the pleas taken herein before trial court at the appropriate stage.
In view of the afore-noted stand taken on behalf petitioner, this petition and pending application are dismissed withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
MARCH 08,2013 pkb of AS Page I I 2013:DHC:7643
JUDGMENT