Full Text
Translation output
$-16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 399/2013
RAM RATAN Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sanjay Dubey, Advocate
BAIL APPLN. 399/2013
RAM RATAN Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sanjay Dubey, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OFDELHI Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
08.03.2013 Crl.M.A. No.3067/2013 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Bail Appln. No. 399/2013 Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in F.I.R. No. 208/2011 under Sections 302/34 of LP.C., registered at Police Station
Ghazipur, Delhi, on the ground that he is in custody since July,
08.03.2013 Crl.M.A. No.3067/2013 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Bail Appln. No. 399/2013 Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in F.I.R. No. 208/2011 under Sections 302/34 of LP.C., registered at Police Station
Ghazipur, Delhi, on the ground that he is in custody since July,
ORDER
2011. However, it is conceded by petitioner's counsel that most of the prosecution evidence have been recorded and out of sixteen witnesses, deposition of fourteen witnesses have already been recorded. Bail is sought as there is delay of 31 hours in lodging of FIR in question. Upon hearing, I find that the aspect of delay cannot be considered at this stage by prejudging the evidence recorded. So, I Bail Appl. No. 399/2013 Page 1 2013:DHC:6987 am not inclined to grant bail to petitionerin this case. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with direction to trial court to expedite the trial ofthis case. (SUNIL GAUR) Judge MARCH 08,2013 pkb Bail Appl. No. 399/2013 Page 2