Full Text
Translation output
C
2^ 1-2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LA.APP. 32/2010
UNION OF INDIA Appellant
Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Appellant.
2^ 1-2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LA.APP. 32/2010
UNION OF INDIA Appellant
Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Appellant.
VERSUS
SH NET RAM & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.Sunil Dahiya, Advocate for the LRs ofdeceased Respondent No.l.
Mr.Parikshit Kumar, Advocate for the RespondentNo.2.
Through: Mr.Sunil Dahiya, Advocate for the LRs ofdeceased Respondent No.l.
Mr.Parikshit Kumar, Advocate for the RespondentNo.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL
ORDER o/o 04.03.2013
ORDER o/o 04.03.2013
JUDGMENT
1. The learned counsel ^for the Appellant states that the present Appeal may be disposed of in terms of the judgment ofthe Division Bench Court rendered in Bhoop Singh Vs. Union ofIndia, 28(1985) DLT240 as the land in the present case as in Bhoop Singh's case pertains to Village Badli and the notification under Section 4 ofthe Land Acquisition Act was issued on 24^ October, 1961.
2. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the Appellant, the Appeal stands dismissed. The LRs of Respondent No.l shall be entitled to compensation in terms of the judgment of this Court rendered in Bhoop Singh (supra). 2013:DHC:7824 X
3. LA.App.32/2010 is disposed of in the above terms. 1^ REVA KHETRAPAL, J. MARCH 04,2013 k