Full Text
LA.APP. 54/2013
DARYAO SINGH & ORS.
Appellants
Through: Mr. L.B. Rai, Advocate
Respondents
Through: Mr. AdhirathSingh, Advocate.
ORDER (ORAL)
: REVA KHETRAPAL, J.
CM No.4204/2013 Exemption granted subject to alljust exceptions.
Application stands disposedof.
JUDGMENT
1. The learned counsel for the Appellants states that the present case is squarely covered bythejudgment of this Court rendered in LA.APP. 63/2013 "Jamna vs. Union of India & Ors." in LPA No.784/2005 decided on 8^'' July, 2011 and that compensation in this appeal can be reasonably be assessed in terms ofthe said judgment.
2. It is pertinent to note that in Jamna's case (supra) compensation was assessed in respect of land situated in Village LA. APR 54/2013 Paee 1 of[3] 2013:DHC:7912 Bakkarwala as on June, 2005 and as on 24^*" September, 2003, whereas the notification in the present case is dated 3'"'' December, 2004. The relevant portion of the judgment in Jamna's case (supra) is reproduced herein:-
. (i) (ii) (Hi) (iv)For the land situated in Village Bakkarwala the fair market value isfixedat f 4,98,589/-per bigha i.e. T23,93,227.20per acre, as on 17.06.2005. (v)For the land situated in Village Bakkarwala the fair market value isfixedat f[4],25,6417- per bigha i.e. ^20,43,076.80per acre, as on 24.09.2003. (vi) (vH) (via) "
3. In "Mange Ram and Ors. vs. Union ofIndia & Ors." in LA. APP. No.128/2012, the compensation in respect of this very Village, that is. Village Bakkarwala in relation to the same LA. APP. 54/2013 Paee 2 of[3] / \ ^ notification i.e. notification dated 3.12.2004 as in present case was decided on 26.09.2012 and the compensation awarded in this case was enhanced to ? 22,71,271/- per acre.
4. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed to the extent that the compensation in respect of acquired land in question is enhanced to ^ 22,71,271/- per acre.
5. In view of the above, LA.APP. No.54/2013 stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. REVA KHETRAPAL, J. MARCH 19, 2013